Hobby Lobby is better than Michaels for a variety of reasons. First, Michaels doesn’t have nearly as large a selection of items.
Second, the prices at Hobby Lobby are generally cheaper than at Michaels. Third, the staff at Hobby Lobby is generally more knowledgeable and helpful than at Michaels. Finally, Hobby Lobby offers more sales and coupons than Michaels.
For all of these reasons, Hobby Lobby is the better choice for your craft and hobby needs.
5 Related Question Answers Found
What is the difference between Michaels and Hobby Lobby?
When it comes to crafting and hobby supplies, two of the most popular stores are Michaels and Hobby Lobby. Both stores offer a wide variety of products, but there are some key differences between them. Michaels is a national chain with over 1,200 locations across the United States.
Is Hobby Lobby bigger than Michaels?
Hobby Lobby is an American chain of arts and crafts stores founded in 1972. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and has over 800 stores across the United States. Michaels is an American chain of arts and crafts stores founded in 1973.
Is Michaels or Hobby Lobby cheaper?
There’s no denying that arts and crafts stores are fun to browse through. They’re full of colorful items and inspiring project ideas. But when it comes time to actually purchase supplies, is it better to go to Michaels or Hobby Lobby?
What's the deal with Hobby Lobby?
It’s no secret that Americans love their hobbies. From fishing and hunting to knitting and scrapbooking, there’s a hobby for everyone. But what about when your hobby becomes your job?
What was the controversy with Hobby Lobby?
The controversy with Hobby Lobby began in 2012 when the US Supreme Court ruled that family-owned businesses could opt out of providing contraception coverage to employees if it violated the owners’ religious beliefs. This ruling was a victory for Hobby Lobby, a chain of craft stores owned by evangelical Christians, which had challenged the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate. The problem with the ruling, however, is that it creates a double standard when it comes to religious freedom.
